DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BUG
Docket No: 5819-13
2 June 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 May 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You reenlisted in the Navy on 18 October 2000 after more than
five years of prior honorable service. You received an adverse
performance evaluation on 15 September 2011 which documented
your failure of the Physical Fitness Assessment and you were not
recommended for promotion. On 30 September 2011, you received
an honorable characterization of service at the end of your
enlistment, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for
reenlistment) reentry code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, prior
honorable service, and contention that only the Navy Personnel
Command (NPC) can issue a chief petty officer an RE-4 reentry
code. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly
assigned the RE-4 reentry code in light of your substandard
performance and non-recommendation for reenlistment. You are
advised that you had to object to your denial of reenlistment to
have NPC make the final determination regarding your reentry
code. You are further advised that the mere passage of time or
post service good conduct do not require the upgrade of a
reentry code. Finally, the Board has not authority to award
punitive damages. in view of the above, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
_ the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
“Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
SRS
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4186-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 April 2009, you were honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of.an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9174 13
You requested that your “MBK5” {expiration of term of service) separation code and “RE-1A" (eligible for reenlistment code} reentry code issued on 22 May 2011 be changed on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). , R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10529-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09936-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2007. On 18 July 2006 the NPC advised your command that ASN had approved the recommendation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4351 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2014. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reentry code given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in two NUPs, a ‘civil conviction and that you were no longer qualified for submarine service... The Board believed you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since Sailors who are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13
Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3796-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S,. The Board . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0792 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. You were released from active duty on 1 May 2011, with an honorable characterization of service and assigned an RE-30 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11272 11
g. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had never been held back in any way from progressing through his Navy career due to security clearance issues and he was not aware that there was a deficiency that would disqualify him from competing for advancement. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...